Revision
Organization | Overview
on Revision | Framing an Argument | Titles and Introductions | Conclusions
| Developing Arguments | Setting
up Quotes | "Real Life" | Adding
a Secondary Source | Proofreading
Day 1
- Organization
- Thesis statement: definition? Wording?
- Topic sentences
- Do Topic Sentences refer back to thesis and division?
- Does essay follow order of division?
- Reword for clarity?
- Provide a smooth transition between paragraphs from one
division to another
- Where can you subdivide a division?
- Framing an argument in the paragraph
- Decide what word/idea needs to be defined
- Try to develop key words/phrases to capture your
definitions that you can then repeat in the paragraph
itself. This kind of repetition makes the argument clearer
to readers by reminding them of your point.
- Goal is to introduce readers to the topic of the paragraph
so they have the information necessary to understand the
argument you're about make.
- Titles and Introductions
- Sources
- Two kinds: literary criticism; content/informational
- Where to include sources?
- What are good sources? What are not so good sources? What
are the sources that I should avoid like the plague?
- Where to find sources? Homework: find at least two sources,
annotate, and bring it to next class
- As we review different databases, type in the name of
the ones you think would work best for your essay right
into your draft.
Day 2
- Making arguments
- Requoting: explaining how individual words explain your
point or contribute to your meaning (student
example). Repeat a word or phrase from the quote and
then use a label/descriptive term to explain how it proves you
point. In Janet's paragraph, she uses "belittled" as a
label.
- Using repetition (Honzell's first body
paragraph): repeat words or ideas that focus the reader
on the main point of the paragraph ("school of life as the
memories or traditions").
1. Decide which word/phrase
you want to repeat in the paragraph. Usually a word/phrase
from your framing of the argument (context provided after
the topic sentence) or the division term from your topic
sentence
2. Generate a list of 1-3 words/phrases that pick up on the
same ideas (synonyms).
3. See where you can insert these words and explain how the
quote/idea you're discussing at that point is valid. This
will keep both you and the reader focused on the argument of
the paragraph.
- "Camping out" -- using argumentative discourse: before
and
after example; and try this list
of
words/phrases to stake out your tent . . . to continue the
camping out metaphor. . .)
- Fleshing out an explanation (student
example); walk the reader through the steps in your
logic -- this leads to that leads to . . .
1. How to walk? Go through a paragraph sentence by sentence, making sure that, as in the example, you're making a reference back to the previous sentence in the next sentence.
- Using description/scenarios ("real life") to make your point
clearer (student example)
1. Go to a particular
paragraph that needs a bit of "life"
2. Develop a scenario or image that can illustrate the point
you're making. Extend an idea that is only implied in
the story, as Janet does in the linked example, or perhaps a
scenario from "real life." Put the characters in another
situation that better illustrates your point.
3. Use repetition of key words and transition into the
scenario and then back into your argument.
- Setting up (framing) an argument in a
paragraph (again)
1. How do you explain
the idea/argument in the topic sentence? What needs
definition?
2. Develop label words that you can repeat in the paragraph
itself.
- Setting up
quote
Avoiding quote bombing: transition into the quote
1. Identify who's
speaking or where it occurs (the narrator, the townspeople;
right after Mabel talks about the dachshund, Literary
critic, professor of psychology)
2. Provide a key word to point the reader to what you want
them to focus on in the quote. "devotion" -- "tough" = love.
3. Shorten quote if possible.
- Time to have fun: Engaging the Reader
example; How to Engage
- Incorporating secondary
sources
- Avoiding plagiarism (worksheet)
- Setting up quote (student
examples)
- Explaining quote
Review of argumentative revision strategies
- Requoting a particular word
- Repetition between sentences to keep reader focused
- Argumentative discourse: sentence patterns; questions
- Spelling out/working out the ramifications of what occurred in
a particular scene
- Creating a scenario or scene to illustrate a point
- Setting up argument in paragraph
- Setting up quote
- Engaging reader . . . having fun.
In class work
Secondary Sources
- Determine where the secondary source would help your argument
- Set up source by providing credentials and foreshadowing for
reader what to focus on in the quote from the source
- Explain how the quote supports your argument.
See How To Incorporate
Secondary Sources and Secondary
Sources for more specifics.
Overview on
Revision
Adapted from The Concise Guide to Writing
The goal of revision is simple: to make your essay more
accurately express what is on your mind to another person. You'll
find that even though you've spend hours planning and writing a
first (or second, or third) draft, your essay will still need work
if your goal is (as it should be) to fully communicate your ideas.
You have two choices: 1) give up and watch reruns of Happy
Days, or 2) roll up your sleeves and get work.
Surprisingly, experienced writers know that good writing takes
many drafts, and thus know that the real writing doesn't begin
until the first drafts are out of the way. Then they discover ways
to delete, move, rephrase, and add material in order to say what
they want to say more clearly and thoughtfully.
While a first draft (or zero draft) is a time for low
expectations, when you shift from drafting to revision, the times
change: it's now time for high expectations. Don't be satisfied
with what's written: keep pushing yourself to make it more
interesting and more specific. In fact, I've found that the
students who are sure that "this is the best paper I've written"
often need more work on their essays, while the students who
aren't fully satisfied with their work often do well.
What these latter students have is a positive attitude towards
writing. They realize that essays aren't "born" (i.e. written in
one or two sittings), but are "made" by attention to details. This
positive attitude is crucial when you look in despair at your
first draft and think "Uh oh!" Don't just give up if you think
most of your essay isn't any good (most writers feel this way).
The key is to divide the work into a series of steps: start with
just your organization, then rest, then work on individual
paragraphs, one at a time. This makes the revision process seem
less onerous -- it may even make it fun.
View the Draft Objectively
To revise, you must read your draft objectively, to see if it
actually says what you intended it to say. If you can, put the
draft aside for a day or two. Getting critical comments from
another reader (get them to answer the specific revision questions
in the textbook instead of just reading it and then asking "well,
whadda' think?") can also help you to view the draft more
objectively.
Reconsider Your Purpose and Audience
Take another look at the assignment sheet and the textbook. Are
you fulfilling the purpose? Ask yourself what you are trying to
accomplish. Does your purpose still seem appropriate for these
particular readers? How could you modify the essay to make it more
effective? Consider each problem and possible solution in light of
your overall writing strategy.
Revise in Stages
After your organization is clear, focus on one paragraph at a
time, make sure it is focuses on one topic and logically moves
from sentence to sentence. Now's the time to add those descriptive
details that help the reader "see" your point.
Look at Big Problems First
Organize, organize, organize. Identify major problems that keep
the draft from achieving its purpose. Does the essay have a clear
thesis, clear divisions, and clear topic sentences? Are the ideas
interesting and well developed? Does the essay have all the
features that readers will expect? (again, look at assignment
sheet and textbook).
Focus Next on Clarity and Coherence
Consider the beginning. How well does it prepare readers for the
essay? Look at each section of the essay in turn. Do the
paragraphs proceed in a logical order? Are there appropriate
transitions to help readers follow from one point to the next? Are
generalizations firmly and explicitly connected to specific
details, examples, or supporting evidence?
Save Stylistic Changes and
Grammatical Corrections for Last
Do not focus on word choice or sentence structure until you are
generally satisfied with what you have written. Then carefully
consider your style and diction. Focus primarily on key terms to
be sure they are appropriate and well defined.
Organization
As you probably remember from English I, real writing starts
after your rough draft is finished: and since your rough draft is
finished, it's time to start really writing. To give you a clearer
idea of the kind of writing expected in this course, below you'll
find several sample paragraphs from previous students that you
should use as a guide as you work your way through your revisions.
And of course the plural "revisions" in the previous sentence
means that, just as the writing process involves several steps,
revision works best when you take it in stages. The first stage,
as the heading above suggests, is organization.
The following work is from Janet Honzell's final draft.
Thesis Statements And Topic Sentences
In the sentences below, you'll find the skeleton of an essay.
First is the thesis and what follows are the topic sentences that
start each of the student's paragraphs. Two things from this
example you should look to include in your own essays are the
repetition of the words from the divisions, and that several
paragraphs were used for one division. Note, as well, how the
rather blunt repetition doesn't seem stiff -- in fact, it helps
the sentences stay connected.
Definition and thesis
Like me, the author of "Everyday Use,"
Alice Walker, agrees that heritage lies in our family
memories and traditions rather than in the items passed
down to us. Walker believes that our family histories have
more value than any item we may be given. She shows us
this in the story through her views of education, of the
Black Nationalist Movement, and through the Johnson
family's handmade quilts.
|
Topic sentences
Walker shows us that she approves more of
the school of life than the school of higher education
mainly through Mrs. Johnson.
Walker also shows us why she prefers the
school of life to the school of higher education through
Dee.
Yet we see the contrast Walker makes
between Dee's schooling and Maggie's when Mrs. Johnson
states, "Sometimes Maggie reads to me. She stumbles along
good naturedly" (73).
Walker also criticizes Dee's character
when her education led her to be involved in the Black
Nationalist Movement.
We can see some of the Black
Nationalists' ideas in Dee when she goes home to see her
mama and Maggie.
Through the family's handmade quilts,
Walker again makes it very clear that Dee has failed to
understand what heritage is.
|
Framing the
Argument in a Paragraph
Readers often need additional information after your topic
sentence to help them understand the connection between your
division and thesis. This helps you frame or set up the
argument for your reader by helping them "see" the point you're
going to make in the paragraph.
Consider the examples below.
Draft
Lack of communication is another problem
in Norma and Leroy's relationship. One day, they
argue about Leroy building them a log house. They talk
back and forth, until "Norma Jean doesn't answer. Under
her breath, she is counting" (681).
|
Revision
In addition to pressures from relatives,
problems in their communication contribute to Norma and
Leroy's separation. Communicating helps people in
relationships work through their issues and listen to what
their partner is feeling. Throughout the story "Shiloh",
Norma and Leroy avoid confronting the problems they have
with each other instead of talking and working through
them. One day, they argue about Leroy building them a
log house. They talk back and forth, until "Norma Jean
doesn't answer. Under her breath, she is counting" (681).
|
Draft
Gimpel is not a fool because he displays
self-control throughout the story. A prime example
of this is when Gimpel walks in on his wife sleeping with
another man.
|
Revision
Self- control is something many people
struggle to attain but Gimpel knows exactly when to use
it. In a stressful situation it can become easy to act on
impulse and say things that are not meant. It is better to
remove yourself from the situation and think of the
possible outcomes that will come from your actions. A
prime example of this is when Gimpel walks in on his wife
sleeping with another man.
|
Titles and
Original and then Revised Introductions
When writing an essay about a particular text, keep the following 3Ts in mind:
- Title: mention title and/or author of story
- Topic: let readers know what you will be focusing on (try picking up on an idea from your introduction -- think of your introduction and title as one unit
- Tone: let readers know your approach -- satiric? bemused? serious?
In academic writing, colons are often used in titles to separate
a "catchy" title from a more specific one. See below for an
example
Where Angels Fear to
Tread: Holy Wisdom in "Gimpel the Fool"
|
This allows you to be creative yet clearly state the subject of
your essay.
Introductions
If the purpose of an introduction is to engage the reader and
provide an overview of your topic, and the purpose of your rough
draft was to get your thoughts down, it's probably time to rewrite
your introduction. Try the following suggestions -- and remember
that in literary essays, you should mention the authors and titles
you'll be covering.
- analogy
- contemporary/historical events
- explain focus of essay
- personal connection
See below for several before and after introductions.
Original #1
Symbolism lays an important role
for an author when he/she is forming a novel. Symbolism is one
of the most widely used literary tactics for hiding a meaning in
a novel or story. In "A Rose for Emily" William Faulkner, the
author, uses symbolism to show the withering of the Southern
aristocracy. Faulkner does this through his vivid descriptions
of Miss Emily's house and possessions, Miss Emily's love
interest, and the change in government.
Revised #1
Picture a beautiful rose given to a
lovely woman by her one and only love. The rose starts to wither
and than eventually turns completely black. An author writing a
story may use change from something beautiful to something dark
to symbolize the fading of the couple's love. Symbolism is a
widely used tactic for authors who want to 'hide' useful pieces
of information, William Faulkner does this quite well in his
story "A Rose for Emily." He uses vivid descriptions of Miss
Emily's house and possessions, her personal life, and the subtle
change in government to symbolize the withering of the Southern
aristocracy.
Better work here developing an idea that pulls
reader into story.
Original #2
For walker, heritage, in Everyday
Use, is taking pride in where one comes from and she proves this
by telling us where they live, what they do, and about the
quilts. Heritage is based on appreciation, acceptance, and
contentment. To appreciate who you are and where you are from,
one must accept themselves and be happy with not only themselves
but their family too.
Revised #2
For Alice Walker, heritage in "Everyday Use," is taking
pride in where one comes from and she proves this by telling us
where they live, what they do, and about the quilts. Growing up
ashamed of your family, or even ashamed of your true self, does
not show pride in heritage. Alice walker shows the two differences
of pride and shame when she writes this story. Dee and Mrs.
Johnson, the mother and oldest daughter, in this story symbolize
these two perceptions of heritage.
This introduction could use more work -- it's
essentially the same as the original.
Original #3
As life-shattering events unfold
around us on a daily basis, there is an increasing need to have
faith, and to believe in the very people intertwined in our
lives. We search for truth and understanding on the difficult
journey we call life, constantly struggling. We struggle to find
credibility in everyday occurrences, as Gimpel searched for in
Issac Bashevis Singer's "Gimpel the Fool". Is Gimpel a fool for
needing to believe in those around him and using his faith to
guide his actions? When a man seeks advice from wiser men, acts
with caution and lives his life believing and trusting his
faith, he is clearly not a fool.
Revised #3
Events such as the recent string
of devastating hurricanes, the war in Iraq and even the events
that unfolded on September 11th, 2001, force us to confront our
relationships with others. They lead us to search for truth and
understanding on the difficult journey we call life. But
sometimes smaller, more personal struggles, like harassment from
a boss at work, rude neighbors, or problems in a relationship,
can lead to a similar revaluation. This more personal struggle
is faced by the character Gimpel in Issac Bashevis Singer's
"Gimpel the Fool." The story involves Gimpel's search for peace
in a hostile environment. The title and the story raises a
question: is Gimpel a fool for needing to believe in those
around him and using his faith to guide his actions? It becomes
clear in the story that three qualities in Gimpel, seeking
advice from wiser men, acting with caution, and living his life
believing and trusting his religious faith, show that he is not
a fool.
Extensive revisions here. The result? An intro that
pulls the reader in and sets up the essay.
Original #4
Gimpel, in "Gimpel The Fool" is not
really a fool because of his ability to have faith, believe, and
forgive others. A fool is defined as one who lacks judgment,
sense, or understanding. Although Gimpel is called a fool by his
peers, the story suggests otherwise as his actions show that
rather than lacking these characteristics, he possesses them.
Revised #4
Many people can recall knowing someone back
in middle school that was usually picked on or teased. During
those years, I was very shy and quiet, which made me an easy
target to ridicule. One thing I never did was open my mouth and
talk back to the people that teased me. I, like Gimpel in Issac
Bashevis Singer's "Gimpel The Fool" knew that talking back would
only cause more problems and make me look like a fool -- like
one of them. So I, like Gimpel, quietly accepted their teasing.
Did that make me a person who "lacks judgment, sense, or
understanding"? Did that make me a fool? Isn't it better to
forgive? Although Gimpel is called a fool by his peers since he
believed all the lies they told him, the story suggests
otherwise as his actions show that he has the ability to have
faith, accept, and forgive others.
Again, extensive revisions here. The personal
connection worked well as did the shift to the story.
Revised #5
Heritage: The
Unending Link between Families
When I was
young, my aunt gave me a golden bracelet for being a flower
girl in her wedding. To many, a bracelet's only purpose is to
be worn around the wrist as an outfit accessory, but for this
particular golden bracelet it stands for much more. When the
two ends are brought together, it forms a circle; a shape that
is never-ending and symbolic for unity. The symbolic nature of
the bracelet signifies the relationship my aunt and I share
and it also reminds me of all the memories that were
experienced together. I consider this to be a part of my
heritage and plan to one day make it a tradition with one of
my nieces. Receiving that bracelet was very special and when
the only connection between relatives is the heritage they
share, every piece of family history becomes that much more
important. Hassan M. A. Al Naboodah, the Dean of the Libraries
at the United Arab Emirates University, believes that "the
preservation of heritage ensures continuity between the
generations." In the short story "Everyday Use," Alice Walker
delves deeper into the meaning of heritage through the
portrayal of a family's lifestyle choices. Walker expresses
her view of heritage as the connection between relatives. She
portrays this by having Mrs. Johnson make daily use of family
heirlooms, preserve the traditional value of the name "Dee,"
and patch together old quilts with memorable clothing from
family members.
Conclusions
Avoid merely summing up your main points (sure to invoke the yawn
reflex). Try to answer or refer back to your introduction -- this
creates a kind of "circle" for the reader and results in a very
satisfying read.
You can also answer the question "What's it all mean?" Now that
readers have completed the essay, what larger meaning can they
derive from your arguments?
Developing an
Argument
For a detailed example of what an argument looks like, let's look
at Ms. Honzell's first few body paragraphs.
Walker shows us
that she approves more of the school of life than the
school of higher education mainly through Mrs. Johnson.
Walker portrays the school of life as the memories or
traditions we learn from our family rather than an item
that is given to us after a loved one dies. As we look at
Mrs. Johnson's character, we see that her professional
education went as high as the second grade. However the
story shows that she was educated by life itself. Mrs.
Johnson still churns butter in the their family churn --
the same churn that was whittled by her father and uncle.
She can kill and fix a hog for meat for their family
dinner as well as any man and make a quilt as well as any
woman. She is used to working hard outside as well as
inside. Mrs. Johnson was born in the time when things were
hard and black people still did not trust a white person
in fear of being beaten. With this fear, you have to
believe that she had been raised seeing racism at its
worst. What we see in Mrs. Johnson, however, is that
growing up with that legacy had also given her a sense of
pride and freedom. We recognize this sense of pride and
freedom when Mrs. Johnson is describing herself. She says
her "fat keeps me hot in zero weather. I can work outside
all day, [and break] ice for washing" (72). We have to
remember that during the period of slavery, the masters
expected their slaves to do these types of chores no
matter what the weather was like or the conditions were.
Mrs. Johnson grew up with the knowledge of her ancestors'
lives and because of this she knows who she is, what she
can do, and she makes no apologies for her lifestyle.
Instead of being ashamed of her lifestyle, she takes pride
in it, knowing that she is continuing the family's rural
traditions. Showing this pride and making Mrs. Johnson a
positive character suggests that Walker, like Mrs.
Johnson, believes our memories and knowledge of our
ancestors' lives is what makes us who we are.
Walker also shows
us why she prefers the school of life to the school of
higher education through Dee. The professional schooling
Dee received made her feel that she was superior to their
family and others. We see how Walker looks down on this
when Dee reads to Mrs. Johnson and Maggie. Mrs. Johnson
states, Dee would be "forcing words, lies" upon them (72).
She "pressed us to her with the serious way she read, to
shove us away at just the moment, like dimwits, we seemed
about to understand" (73). Mrs. Johnson's choice of words
-- such as "forcing" and "pressed us," "shove us away" --
show us how belittled she felt as she sat under her
daughter's authority. She seems to feel trapped without a
means of escape until Dee is finished with them. It seems
Dee used her education to hang over people's heads rather
than to help others become better educated themselves.
Here, we see the distaste Walker has for higher education.
She shows us during these reading times there are no
memories, traditions, or compassion worth being passed on
to the next generation.
|
One of the elements that makes this a satisfying read is the
clear organization that guides you through the paragraphs, with
each topic sentence referring clearly back to her division. Note
how her first topic sentence repeats the focus word "education"
from the division, allowing the reader to quickly think "Oh yeah,
she did say she was going to talk about education."
Notice that the next paragraph expands further on the idea of
education -- and to be sure the reader doesn't get lost, Janet
again uses repetition -- "school of life" -- to guide the reader
through her information.
Oddly, the repetition of focus words from the division statement
doesn't seem forced or unnatural, which is something to keep in
mind as you revise your own thesis and topic sentences.
Use repetition of key words (within reason, of course) or
synonyms within the paragraph to keep readers focused on
the topic of that paragraph. Think of them as a friendly
nudge on the shoulder of the reader that says "Hey you,
this is my point -- stop thinking about what you'll have
for lunch tomorrow and pay attention."
|
Janet's meticulous explanations -- repeating words from quotes,
using "Walker" to keep readers focused on thesis, etc. -- makes
for a very convincing argument. I especially like how she makes
the story "come alive" in the third paragraph, imagining a scene
under the elm tree which vividly illustrates her argument that
family memories -- school of life -- is more important than the
book knowledge of Dee. While some additional proofreading would
have smoothed out the rough edges of her prose, overall, you read
the paragraphs and have to say "Yep, she's right" -- which is the
mark of a good argument.
You have to be the "ignorant
reader;" thus as you revise your essay, think of the
questions a reader -- who can't get inside your head and
know how you're thinking -- would have and then work on
answering them.
- "What in the work backs up the point
you're making here?"
- "Why did the author choose this way of saying it?"
(tone of words [angry, melancholy, excited, etc.])
- "How does this quote back up your point?"
- "What about the symbolism/connotations etc. of this
word?"
- "Why do you think this is important?"
- "What does this connect with in real
life/history/psychology/economics/etc.?"
You can try the following techniques to move from "it's in
my head" to "it's on the screen."
- Labeling: provide a word to describe -- "label" --
your argument. In the Camping
Out example, the writer used "avoidance" and
"defensive" and then describes how the quote contained
those qualities. In Janet's example above, "pride" is
used effectively in the first paragraph to accentuate
the argument that Mrs. Johnson's views are positive, and
"superior" and "belittled" are used in the second to
show that Dee's are negative.
- See "If . . . then" sentence pattern below
- Use a contrast or comparison
- Define a word to draw out its ramifications
- Try using a verb from the following list to shift into
argument
-
agree argue
believe charge
claim
comment conclude consider
|
criticize declare
describe define
discover
emphasize explain
feels
|
illustrate imply indicate
reinforce
reveals
shows
suggests
supports
|
Sample sentences to explain quotes might follow these
patterns -- and you can use the list of words above to
change the ideas.
- This _[label word]___
suggests/conveys/illustrates (see list of words above)
that _______
- They
indicate/emphasize/reveal the ____
- This emphasis on finding ______
suggests that _____
- Supporting this idea of the
___fall of the aristocracy__ __importance of
conversation__ __Updike's critique of American social
class__, the narrator adds _______
- The description reinforces the
idea that ______
- If Emily is ____ then
_____
- If heritage is ____ then
_____
- If Leroy continues _____
then _____
- If Sammy would have _____
then _____
This kind of writing anticipates the kinds of things a
careful, respectful, thoughtful, intelligent reader
(that's me) will be looking for.
|
Karen Schreiber does a fine of explaining her thinking in the
following paragraph. In particular, note how she doesn't stop at
the quote: her explanations are what make for a fine argument.
Her thesis was as follows
The townspeople are the real fools and
Gimpel is actually a more caring, wiser, and a much more
religious man then they are.
|
One of her body paragraphs follows
In spite of the townspeople's foolish
behaviors, Gimpel remained a caring man. When he was
accused of calling everyone a liar, Gimpel thought to
himself, "What was I to do? I believed them and I hope at
least that did them some good"(79). Gimpel's thought
process reveals his superior caring nature. After
continual harassment, Gimpel still cares enough about his
fellow man to hope they get some satisfaction. It is a
much less foolish thought to wish good on to others than
it is to wish hateful things, which Gimpel has every right
to do. When Elka, Gimpel's wife, gave birth to a child
seventeen weeks after they were married and she told him
that the child was his, Gimpel reveals, "To tell the plain
truth, I didn't believe her..."(82). However, after the
child was born Gimpel says, "I began to forget my sorrow.
I loved the child madly and he loved me too"(82). Here
Gimpel is showing his ability to care for a child that he
has been lied to about. A foolish man might have turned
the child away, but Gimpel seems to understand that a
child needs love and that the baby itself had nothing to
do with the betrayal.
|
Framing
- Again
We've already discussed framing on Day 1 of revision. But now
that you've done more work on your paragraph and perhaps found
research to support your arguments, let's take another look at how
to frame a paragraph.
Wyatt uses a paragraph to frame his argument on one of the
factors inhibiting Zoya's growth. This is from his rough
draft: what works and what needs work?
Zoya's never-ending drive to lose himself in fantasy and
the digital world suppresses his growth and maturity. There
are many ways to
enjoy fantasy such as reading a Tolkien novel, an X Men
comic, or in Zoya's case, playing Metal Gear. Although
there is nothing wrong with enjoying fantasy, it may
become a problem, especially with video games, because it
is
easy get lost: hours may seem like minutes in
the virtual world. This can lead to dissociation. In The
Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse researchers associate this with a person's "ability to disconnect
from one's present experience, allowing people to feel
good and lose track of time (Wood et al. 80). In the real world, this means that gamers can look at a clock and see that almost the entire day has gone by. The time needed to grow as a person and build the family and social connections that lead to maturity are lost. And it all started with a deep dive into a fantasy virtual world.
In Zoya's case, this dissociation leads him to
"disconnect" from his family. Instead of interacting
with his sister when she knocks on his door, he thinks,
"Ignore the knock. It's just your sister. Get back to the
game" (205). His focus is on "the game." A
knock is a signal to engage, a sign that the person
knocking wants to interact. That engagement is the
kind of social activity that leads to maturity.
Humans grow through social interactions. If a person
ignores them, how can they grow? And in families,
particularly immigrant families, the drive to connect and
maintain ties is strong. Zoya's rejection of his sister
becomes a rejection of his family and his source of
connection back to the home and adopted country. To
"Ignore" them is to ignore the support group that guides a
person to maturation.
|
The example paragraphs below offer a mixture of writing that's
strong and writing that needs work.
Example 1
The description of Emily's house suggests the death and decay
of the upper class. Readers and authors alike depend on the
description of the setting in a story to give them a sense of
atmosphere, a better understanding of the characters and above
all, the message of the story. Take for example, the pitiful
description of Emily's home. William Faulkner illustrates that "it
was a big, squarish frame house that had once been white,
decorated with cupolas and scrolled balconies in the heavily
lightsome style of the seventies, set on what had once been our
most select street" (308). During the Pre-Civil War time, a
person's home and land were looked upon as a way to measure their
wealth. The more a home was "larger than life," the
wealthier, more powerful and higher up in
society the person who owned it was. Faulkner notes
that Emily's home was once "an eyesore among eyesores" (308). This
suggests that Emily was once of a high class in the Old
Southern society because of her once impressive home.
The writer adds that "only Miss Emily's house was left, [ .
. . ] decay above the cotton wagons and the gasoline pumps" (308).
The decaying of this once magnificent stronghold has become
the physical representation that the Old South is dying off.
Emily's home has become a remnant of what the Old South once was.
The readers no longer see the wealthy and power of the
Old South, but rather the extinction of an old
Southern lifestyle. In the same way the author uses our sight to
demonstrate the message of the story; he also uses our sense of
smell to stress the importance of the decaying home.
Faulkner describes that her home "smelled of
dust and disuse- a close, dank smell" (309). This emphasizes the
decay and death of people in the upper-class. Those of the
Old South are now dust in the cold and dank ground; a place where
they are no longer of use. Nonetheless, no longer
does the Old South live in its glory days, but rather in
its death through Emily's decaying home.
Example 2
Decay is not only evident in Emily's physical being, but also in
her home. The house too serves as a mirror for the Southern
aristocracy's deterioration. Like Emily, the house's decay truly
sets in after the death of Emily's father and the loss of her
lover, Homer Barron. Initially, the smell was the first
indication of decay, which was cured when the townspeople "broke
open the cellar door and sprinkled lime there, and in all the
outbuildings"(30). Then came the visual decay: "It was
a big, squarish frame house that had once been white, decorated
with cupolas and spires and scrolled balconies in the heavily
lightsome style of the seventies, set on what had once been our
most select street"(28). The outside deterioration and smell
were the only public indications, since "no one save an old
manservant-a combined gardener and cook-had seen it[inside the
house] in at least ten years"(28).
Example 3
Just as her house represented the decay
of Southern aristocracy, Emily herself represented the last
bastion of Southern nobility. Emily's refusal to relinquish
the past, a past steeped in tradition and heritage, had become a
symbol of decay and deterioration. To illustrate, Emily -- once a
young delicate flower of Southern womanhood -- had grown into a
frumpish old woman: "She looked bloated, like a body long
submerged in motionless water, and of pallid hue" (29). Emily's
body had become fat and out of proportion in the same way that the
old South had become out of proportion with the rising generation
of Southerners. In addition to this physical deterioration,
Emily's mental state was also on a rapid decline. Her
steadfast refusal to deny the present and hold on to past caused
her much mental grief and anguish. Emily denied the death of
Colonel Sartis, a member of the old generation of Southerners.
Colonel Sartis was a link to the South's once glorious days. She
admonished the deputation "See Colonel Sartis I have no taxes in
Jefferson" (30). In refusing to accept that the Colonel was dead
she was further able to deny the demise of Southern aristocracy
and the birth of the new South. Emily was gradually becoming
more mentally unstable. The refusal to also acknowledge the death
of her father years before also illustrates her precarious mental
state. When her dear father died she did not don mourning clothes
and act as a grief stricken daughter might. Instead she denied his
passing to herself and the townsfolk who had made a condolence
call. It was not until the authorities were almost called that she
allowed his decomposing body to be buried. As Emily's grasp on
reality began to rapidly wane, her denial of the death and decay
that surrounded her was also mounting. Her mental state had so
deteriorated that when her Yankee lover tried to leave her she
refused to let him go. She chose to poison him and to keep the
decaying corpse in a shrine like room, a fitting tribute to the
death and deterioration of her house, herself and Southern
aristocracy.
The obvious question is which paragraph works better? It's clear
that example three, with its detailed explanations and examples,
makes a convincing argument.
Use "Real Life"
Comparisons/Descriptions to explain a quote
When making connections/explanations from the example to your
argument, try comparing the quote/situation to "real life" -- how
do people, in general, react to such events/statements. Example?
Okay. In an essay on Sammy (of "A&P" fame) as an everyday
hero, you can compare his character flaws with the apparent
absence of such flaws in a stereotypical hero like a New York
firefighter (of course, you would note how the first person point
of view helps reveal Sammy's flaws). Since ignorant readers don't
usually grasp your explanation the first time, you need to
compensate by explaining how your quote supports your argument
from several different perspectives. Keep in mind that this -- the
explanation -- is the basis of your argument, and the quality of
your argument, not the work you put into the essay, or your great
examples, is what determines your grade.
You can also, as Ms. Honzell does below, develop an argument by
working out an implied point:
Yet,
we
see the contrast Walker makes between Dee's schooling and
Maggie's when Mrs. Johnson states "Sometimes Maggie reads
to me. She stumbles along good-naturedly" (73). Walker
uses this contrast to show that, in her view, stumbling
along is much more important than forcing words on others
as Dee did. Mrs. Johnson seems to enjoy Maggie reading to
her. We can almost picture Maggie and her mama sitting
together under the elm tree laughing while Maggie sounds
out words in the book. There is no belittling during this
reading time, only pure enjoyment and pleasure. Walker
uses these reading times to make her argument for the
school of life. We are led to observe the happy memories
Maggie's reading evokes in her mama and compare them to
the unhappy memories that were stirred up when Dee read to
her family. This negative connotation leads us to see
Dee's view of heritage as cold, lacking any deep feelings
or compassion.
|
Engaging
Readers
If your readers are lulled asleep by your prose, then you aren't
going to convince them. Try using descriptive words,
imagery, and analogies to keep the reader engaged with your work,
and in the process, persuaded that your arguments are valid.
In the paragraphs below, you can see how Lucia moves from just
stating her argument to grabbing you by the collar and pulling you
in: she makes it clear that there's a distinctive -- and
intelligent -- voice behind these words. And that is a good
place to leave your readers.
Rough draft: (Labeled
"Worst Draft Ever" by Lucia)
Thesis: John Updike's "A&P" is a critique of American
society because of Sammy's negative view of the dominant
tribe within A&P, his acquired sympathy for the girls,
and his struggle against the majority.
Sammy's struggle begins with his poor image of the
customers and workers of A&P. He often refers to the
customers as "sheep" when he speaks of them as groups, an
idea reinforces when Sammy notes "the sheep pushing their
carts down the aisle- the girls were walking against the
usual traffic (not that we have one-way signs or
anything)- were pretty hilarious" (pg. 410, paragraph 5).
One does not need to that example to know sheep all think
alike and follow each other blindly. This "sheep"
mentality is not limited to the customers. Acknowledging
that he and his coworker Stokesie are similar (he's
married with two babies chalked up on his fuselage
already, but as far as I can tell that's the only
difference" [pg. 411, paragraph 9]), he also scoffs at
Stokesie's dream of someday becoming a manager. With that
being said, it's no surprise Sammy's opinion of Lengel is
not much better, using words such as "dreary and "gray" to
describe him. His description of the sheep and his
coworkers blend together to paint a lackluster, monotonous
landscape within A&P; a cycle of predictability that
Sammy does not fit.
|
Final Draft
Thesis: John Updike's "A&P" illustrates a
critique of 1960's through the narrator's negative view of
the dominant tribe within A&P, his sympathy for the
girls, and his struggle against the majority.
Sammy's place among the tribe of A&P allows him a
negative view of his coworkers and customers. In the early
1960's, a young man of his age would have been expected to
secure a job and marriage. Updike provides hints to
Sammy's hesitation to follow said path through the
strong contrast. Stokesie serves as a glimpse
into a possible future. He is described by Sammy as
"married with two babies chalked up in his fuselage
already, but as far as I can tell that's the only
difference. He's twenty-two and I was nineteen this April"
(411). Despite their similarities, Sammy seems to view him
as a chump because of his marital status, and scoffs at
Stokesie's managerial aspirations, suggesting a lack of
satisfaction in that possibility. Lengel, the store's
manager, also provides an important contrast as the
embodiment of traditional values. Painted as "pretty
dreary, teaches Sunday school, and the rest" (412), Updike
sculpts a figure that represents the humdrum results of
the 9-5, the religious influence that permeated through
1960's America, and a suggestion that the whole package-
imagine the button-up shirt, the white picket fence, the
meat loaf awaiting in the oven- comes vacuum-sealed within
a simple series of choices (See Stokesie).
However, most of Sammy's displeasure is concentrated on
the customers of A&P whom he dubs "sheep". Being a
member of the staff, coupled with his dislike of the
day-to-day American lifestyle, gives him a vantage point
where he observes their repetitious cycle of behavior in
an almost comedic light: "the sheep pushing their carts
down the aisle- the girls were walking against the usual
traffic (not that we have one-way signs or anything)- were
pretty hilarious [. . .] I bet you could set off dynamite
in an A&P and the people would by and large keep
reaching and checking oatmeal off their lists [. . . .]
But there was no doubt, this jiggled them" (410-411). But
all jokes aside, it is important to acknowledge the
derogatory connotations attached to the term "sheep":
people on auto-pilot, going mindlessly about their
business. Sammy's attitude allows the reader to see not
only the fallacies in this lifestyle, but also how he is
different from these people.
|
Lucia's prose snaps, crackles and pops, ensuring that your eyes
stay on the page and that your brain stays active. It also
convinces you that her analysis is valid -- which is the goal of
any analytical writing, be it an explanation of how the First
Amendment means limits need to be placed on campaign financing, or
an internal corporate report on the regulatory advantages of
contributing to political campaigns.
Analysis rules . . . in more ways than you think.
How to Engage
Explaining Quote Suggestions
Explain how quote is connected to the topic sentence --
focus on the language used: consider the following
- Repetition, repetition, repetition
- Words associated with negative view: "hesitation,"
"chump," "scoffs," "lack of satisfaction,"
"contrast," "humdrum."
- Having a bit of fun with descriptive words to give
your writing a pulse
- Where to start? "Tribe among the A&P"; "view
him as a child"; "the whole package --imagine the
button up shirt, the white picket fence, the
meatloaf in the oven -- comes vacuum sealed"
- What's the connotation/symbolism of specific
words?
- Give it a name ("traditional values," "said path")
and explain how the word/s conveys it.
- How does the imagery, tone of the quote/word create
meaning?
- Give it a name ("chump" again, "simple series of
choices") and explain how the imagery, tone, etc.
conveys it.
- What's the psychology/motivation of a character?
- Give it a name ("scoffs," "hesitation", "lack of
satisfaction") and explain how the quote suggests
this.
- Use an analogy to help readers understand what you're
trying to say
- "9-5," "white picket fence"
- "If . . . then" sentence patterns
- What connections to historical events would deepen a
reader's understanding of your argument?
- "the religious influence that permeated through
1960s America"
- How could the definition of a specific word help
readers' understand how it proves the point you're
making?
|
© David Bordelon
|