Template

Course Links
Lesson Plans
Course Documents Links
Secondary Sources

Quick Links
Library Links
Citing Sources

The Short Story Home Page

 

Dr. Bordelon's The Short Story: On Campus

Week 1: A Beginning

Titles of Stories, Page Numbers, and Date Published
"A&P" (1544 or 1492) published in 1962; " The Colonel " published in 1981

Introduction to Assignment: #1

Updike's "A&P" and Forche's "The Colonel" represent two approaches to short stories: "A&P" is a quiet story of a young man's initiation into adulthood -- a situation that many readers can identify with; on the other hand, "The Colonel" is a dark and shocking descent into an underworld that, hopefully, few readers have experienced.

In "A&P," Updike attempts to construct a familiar world in the hopes that readers will pause and, for a moment, consider the drama of everyday life. Throughout the semester, we'll be looking at stories -- such as "Everyday Use" "Shiloh," etc. -- with a similar intent. This type of fiction, since it doesn't deal with dictators who wield a murderous bent or very old men with enormous wings suddenly appearing on a doorstep, requires that the reader pay attention to the smaller details -- the interior life of the character as expressed by his or her thoughts and utterances, comments made by other characters -- to fully enter into the world constructed by the author. As Updike himself once noted, "I distrust books involving spectacular people, or spectacular events. Let People and The National Enquirer pander to our taste for the extraordinary; let literature concern itself, as the Gospels do, with the inner lives of hidden men. The collective consciousness that once found itself in the noble must now rest content with the typical" ("Updike").

The familiarity of these "hidden men" and their "hidden lives" aren't meant to breed contempt; instead, the authors construct an interesting, vivid world from the seemingly boring, mundane features of everyday life -- a teenager's futile attempt to make an impression, a sister's conflict over a quilt , a marriage falling apart. Like life, the stories may not lead to an obvious climax, and like life, the messages or meaning they impart may not be readily apparent. These types of stories respect the reader's intellect; in effect, they say "I realize that you're a discerning reader -- you don't need a dramatic confrontation between the forces of good and evil to engage your mind." These stories ask you to ponder the subtle forces of everyday life -- a compliment that goes unnoticed, a store manager's inflexibility -- and their ramifications. Often, these ramifications are left unsaid by the writer: as in life, there are no easy answers, and part of the challenge of these stories is that the endings may leave you with questions instead of answers.

"The Colonel" represents another branch of short fiction. Here, and in other stories dealing with more obviously dramatic situations, the world presented by the author is often strange, surreal, or exaggerated. In works such as these, writers attempts to break through the background static of modern life, be it the judicial farce that was the O.J. trial, Jerry Springer's circus of human oddities, and the thongs and cigars of our recent Presidential sex scandal, with vivisections ("Carnal Knowledge"), supernatural apparitions ("Gimpel the Fool"), the "swollen black bruise" under the eye of a dead GI ("The Things They Carried") and other exaggerated situations.

The shock of these fictions is like a jackhammer chipping away at convention and reality -- the seemingly placid façade of life and the ennui it creates. But creating this shock presents problems of balance for the writer. Flannery O'Connor, in her essay "The Grotesque in Southern Fiction," notes that a writer needs to "know how far he can distort without destroying" (383). The difference between horror for horror's sake -- see the string of Saw movies -- and horror to jar the reader out of complacency -- see a story like "The Colonel" -- lies in this ability to "distort" events, yet maintain a connection with the hopes, fears, and longings of the "real" world.

These more exaggerated short stories take fantastic situations -- how often are you attacked in a doctor's office by a girl with acne named Mary Grace? -- and uses them to comment or reflect upon "real" life. Just as in quieter, more "realistic" stories, the writers respect your intellect; here, they trust that the fissures -- the cracks that they've opened in our jaded minds -- by virtue of their exaggeration, will, paradoxically, reveal a more heightened reality. While the drama is apparent, the meanings, again, just as in more realistic stories, are often up to the reader to decipher. For instance, just what does a bag of ears flung upon a table mean?

Thus both types of short stories share a desire to make readers reflect on their own lives and experiences, challenge their preconceptions while creating entertainment. When the two are combined, I get a sensation in my mind of a whirring, tactile pleasure -- what Emily Dickinson described as "feel[ing] physically as if the top of my head were taken off" (1018).  In short, these stories make your brain itch, and that, to me, is the definition of a successful short story -- or any work of literature. In these two stories, as in all the stories we read, the authors have created distinct and specific worlds: it's up to you to visit them.

Let's get started. . . .

Work Cited

Dickinson, Emily.  "Emily Dickinson on Writing." Literature: An Introduction to Fiction,

Poetry, and Drama. Ed. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. New York: Longman, 1998.

1018-19. Print.

O'Connor, Flannery. From "The Grotesque in Southern Fiction." Literature: An Introduction to

Fiction, Poetry, and Drama . Ed. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. New York: Longman.

1998. 382-383. Print.

Updike, John. "Updike on Updike." New York Times Book Review 27 September 1981: Sec.7, 1.

Web. 14 Jan 1999.


Questions to mull over as you interpret the story

"A&P"
  1. Why an "A&P?" Note title -- not "Sammy" but "A&P." Why the emphasis on the setting in the title?
  2. Beyond the obvious -- he quits - how does Updike separate Sammy from the rest of the people in the A&P? Consider everyone, Lengel, Stokesie, the girls, the customers. Okay, how why does he do this?
  3. Why does Sammy quit? Is it only because Lengel was rude to the girls?
  4. What's a hero? Is Sammy in any way a realistic (and what do I mean by realistic?) hero?
  5. What is Sammy's view of "policy" (1544)? Does it fit in or clash with Sammy's view of life?
  6. Why does Sammy feel that "once you begin a gesture it's fatal not to go through with it" (1545). What does this illustrate about his character?
  7. Has this event changed Sammy? Has he learned anything? If so, what, and if not, why not?
  8. Who does Updike seem to favor -- Sammy and the values he represents or Lengel and the values he represents? How can you tell?

The male gaze

1. A manner of treating women’s bodies as objects to be surveyed, which is associated by feminists with hegemonic masculinity, both in everyday social interaction and in relation to their representation in visual media: see also objectification.

2. In film theory, the point of view of a male spectator reproduced in both the cinematography and narrative codes of cinema, in which men are both the subject of the gaze and the ones who shape the action and women are the objects of the gaze and the ones who are shaped by the action. In her psychoanalytic theory of the male gaze, Laura Mulvey argues that in classical Hollywood cinema, the film spectator oscillates between two forms of looking at the female image: voyeuristic looking involves a controlling gaze; fetishistic looking involves an obsessive focus on some erotic detail (see also voyeurism). She claims that these conventions reflect the values and tastes of patriarchal society.

Chandler, Daniel, and Rod Munday. Male Gaze. Oxford University Press, 2016, Oxford Reference Collection, accessed 9 September 2019.

"The Colonel"
  1. What is implied in the odd opening? After reading the story, what have "we" heard that "is true?" What effect does it lend to the entire work?
  2. Good question from the textbook: "Discuss the use of understatement in describing horrible things."
  3. Though it's never clearly stated, why do you think the narrator has met the Colonel?
  4. Where does the story take place? How can you tell?
  5. What words/descriptions suggest normalcy?
  6. What words/descriptions slide into the sinister? Can any words work both ways?
  7. What's the tone of the narrator? Angry? Neutral? Indignant? Indifferent?

Group Questions

"A&P"

  1. Beyond the obvious -- he quits - how does Updike separate Sammy from the rest of the people in the A&P? Consider everyone, Lengel, Stokesie, the girls, the customers. Okay, how why does he do this?
  2. Why does Sammy quit? Is it only because Lengel was rude to the girls?
  3. What's a hero? Is Sammy in any way a realistic (and what do I mean by realistic?) hero?
  4. Who does Updike seem to favor -- Sammy and the values he represents or Lengel and the values he represents? How can you tell?

"The Colonel"

  1. What is implied in the odd opening to "The Colonel"? After reading the story, what have "we" heard that "is true?" What effect does it lend to the entire work?
  2. Good question from an old textbook: "Discuss the use of understatement in describing horrible things" in "The Colonel."
  3. What's the tone of the narrator? Angry? Neutral? Indignant? Indifferent? Speculate why the writer chose this tone.

What The Author/Critics Say

"Ambiguous ceremonies of farewell dominate Pigeon Feathers [the collection "A&P" is taken from], as maturing characters begin to realize how far they have receded from the past and strive to accommodated themselves to the present" (Luscher 23).

"Unhappiness in an Updike story moves the character not to large-scale significant action but to quiet frustration, and thus some readers respond by saying that nothing happens. Plot and characterization often give way to layers of meaning usually dependent upon an image or a gesture so that dramatization becomes meditation. The question to ask, it seems to me, is not what happens but what is felt or exposed" (Greiner 92).

Greiner, Donald J. The Other John Updike: Poems/Short Stories/Prose/Play. Athens, Ohio: OUP,

1981. Print.

Luscher, Robert. John Updike: A Study of the Short Fiction. New York: Twayne, 1993.

© 2008 David Bordelon