Quick Tips | Sample Paragraph | Revising a Paragraph and Adding Sources
Remember that the core of literary writing is the use of
quotes. My own planning typically starts off with a typed list of
quotes from the story that I can use to support the points I'm making.
Parts of a Body Paragraph
- Topic sentence (connects back to thesis and division)
- Definitions/Explanation of topic sentence
- Quotes (intro, quote and explanation -- see below)
- Conclusion
Quick
Tips for Body Paragraphs
- Make a list of quotes to use for evidence
- Define any ideas in topic sentence
- Provide context
to set up quotes
- Explain how quote is connected to the topic
sentence -- focus on the language used (connotation of specific words,
symbolism of imagery, tone [sarcasm, irony, humor, etc.], etc.)
Try using a verb from the following list to shift into argument (see Verb List page
for sample sentences using these words)
agree argue
believe charge
claim
comment conclude consider
|
criticize declare
describe define
discover
emphasize explain
feels
|
illustrate imply indicate
reinforce
reveals
shows
suggests
supports
|
Sample sentences might follow these patterns
This ____ suggests that _______
They indicate the ____
This emphasis on finding ______ suggests that
Supporting this idea of the sea as female, the narrator adds _______
The description reinforces the idea that ______
|
- Repeat focus/argument word from topic sentence
within your paragraph to keep readers, uh, focused on your
argument(this is an important point that writers often neglect)
- Revise by deletion: take out whatever doesn't
fit with argument
- Revise by addition: explain how a particular
word makes your point; use an analogy to make your argument clearer
- Proofread! (commas, basics done - double space
lines, cite properly, include question, etc.)
Follow these steps, bake at 350° for 2 hours (or
however long it takes you work on the paragraph) and viola' a completed
body paragraph, suitable for company.
|
Three parts to setting up a quote
- introduce quote and provide context so reader
can understand why you're using it -- state the "who said it" and
"where/when" of the quote (a word from the verb list above can really
help);
- “insert quote and” (citation);
- explain how/why quote proves your point – focus on
individual words or actions: repetition helps.
Follow the format below for a well argued paragraph:
Paragraph format
- A main point stated in one sentence: make it an
argument/statement
Example topic sentence (Note
that it is a claim that needs to be backed up):
Gimpel is not a fool
because his desire to avoid conflict is noble.
- An explanation of any general words or
ideas in your main point. In the sentence above, what do you mean by
"conflict" and "noble" and how does it prevent someone from being a
fool?
Example :
Instead of stooping to
the townspeople's level and arguing with them, Gimpel decides to remain
above them. This distancing, especially when contrasted with the
cruelty of the pranks played on him, invests Gimpel with a dignity
sorely lacking in Frampol's inhabitants.
- Examples or details that support your point (use
quotes from the story that illustrate what you are talking about).
Remember to preface the quote with an introductory phrase that provides
a context for it:
Example :
Early in the story
Gimpel acknowledges his strength, "If I slapped someone he'd see all
the way to Cracow." But he softens this harshness by quickly adding,
"But I'm not really a slugger by nature. I think to myself, Let it
pass" (99).
Note page number in parenthesis and period after
page number.
- After each example ask the following question in your
head – "how does this example prove my point?" and "why is this quote
important in this paragraph?" – and then answer in your essay. This is
where you prove your argument. As a sentence starter, try "This" and
then an explanatory word (reveals, implies, illustrates, shows,
demonstrates, proves, suggests, defines, supports, or indicates) or a
restatement of your example (ex. "Gimpel's reluctance to use his
strength") and then an explanatory word to begin your commentary – try
using a synonym of the focus word in the topic sentence to make
connection to focus of paragraph clear to the reader.
Example :
Unlike the townspeople,
his actions show that Gimpel has a self-awareness which would be
lacking in a true fool; a realization that he can change things if he
wants. His thoughtfulness suggests a sympathetic mind at work,
qualities which, instead of illustrating foolishness, suggest dignity
and repose.
or
Gimpel's
reluctance to use his strength shows that he is making a conscious
decision to act the way he does. A fool merely reacts – Gimpel thinks,
and then acts.
- A sentence to sum up.
Example :
His good nature proves to
the reader that, far from a fool, Gimpel is a wise and kind man.
Does this seem programmatic? It is. Most reasoned, academic writing
follows particular formats. Your challenge is to take the form and make
it sing.
Before
and after Revision #1| How
to incorporate a secondary source | Before
and after revision #2
When revising a paragraph or adding sources, you're
aiming for two things: explanation and clarity. The first,
explanation, means adding and deleting sentences to make your meaning
clear to the "ignorant reader." And since all readers are
ignorant of what you are trying to say, it's your job to experiment and
find different ways of presenting your thoughts on paper (or a screen,
as the case may be): "How, exactly, does the quote from the
story or outside source prove your point?" "Why do you include
this sentence?" "Where do you address the second part of the
topic sentence?" These are all the kinds of questions that will prompt
you to add explanation.
The clarity comes in as you whittle down and starting
working on the wording of your sentences and placement of
punctuation. Have you set up the quote with context?
Have you properly cited your source?
Note on citations :
We'll be using MLA citation for all of our work. Also, cite
the articles as if you found them yourself on the database or checked
out the book yourself (thus, you will not be citing from our web site,
but from the articles themselves). Correct format for all
sources can be found in the The
Source for Citing Sources .
Here we have a paragraph that was submitted as a final
draft.
Paragraph
1
Sammy is an everyday hero
because his character is flawed. He is not perfect, nor does he pretend
to be. Just like everyone else in the world, Sammy has his
imperfections. This makes him a realistic hero because he is just
that-real. He is an ordinary boy with an ordinary job, but he uses his
courage to quit his job for the girls that got embarrassed. He would be
considered a hero in everyday life.
What's missing in this paragraph are quotes from the
story that would provide evidence to support the writer's
assertions. Without specific quotes, the assertions are just
that: assertions. The moral? Be sure to base your
assumptions/assertions on quotes.
Let's look at a revised version of the same paragraph --
which includes an outside source.
Revised Paragraph 1 -- with research added
Sammy is an everyday hero
because his character is flawed. Just like everyone else in
the world, Sammy has imperfections. For instance, his
chauvinistic view of women marks him as a character in need of an
attitude adjustment. When he poses the question "You never
know for sure how girls' minds work (do you really think it's a mind in
there or just a little buzz like a bee in a glass jar?)" (15), it's
clear that Updike is fashioning a character who is burdened, much like
others, with prejudices. This shows that, just like everyone
else in the world, Sammy has imperfections. Updike, choosing
a first person narrator that allows readers to "hear" Sammy's thoughts,
puts these imperfections on display. Yet it is these same
flaws that make him a realistic hero. His heroism is not of the
rescue-a-woman-from-a-burning-building variety. Instead, he
is an ordinary boy with an ordinary job whose courage forces him to
quit his job because of Lengel's treatment of the
girls. In fitting with his ordinary character, he
decides to speak against an action that, as Updike notes in an
interview "seems suddenly cruel and unethical," (qtd. Murray
34). In choosing to quit a job over the treatment of people
he does not know, Sammy joins the long line of everyday heroes who
stand up for others, regardless of the consequences.
Works
Cited
Murray, Donald.
"Interview with John Updike." "A&P." Ed.
Wendy
Perkins. Fort
Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace College
Publishers,
1998. 33-37. Print.
Updike,
John. "A&P." Literature: An
Introduction to Fiction,
Poetry and Drama.
Ed. X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia.
New York: Longman, 2002. 14-19. Print.
This is, quite literally, a revision. The
writer has looked again at what was written, and made the necessary
changes (here mainly additions) to make their point
clearer. Much of the original paragraph remains,
but this version is more persuasive because it supplies information
from the story, and, in particular, provides a more detailed
argument. Pay attention to how the quotes, both from the
story and from the source, are set up with context so that
readers can understand why they are included -- even before they read
them.
For clarity, pay attention to the placement of periods
in both the in-text citations and the format of the works cited
entries.
When incorporating a secondary source, try following the
steps below:
1) introduce quote by providing context -- and be
sure to include author's name.
That the lesson Sammy learns
comes at a cost is also suggested by Robert Luscher who argues that
Sammy is
The word "that" often comes in handy. And remember to
include the author's name in the sentence ("You just mentioned
including the author's name above." "I'm glad you're paying
attention.").
2) include quote
"[. . .] beginning to learn
lessons of bittersweet triumph" (30).
The square brackets and the ellipsis dots signal the
reader that you are including the ellipsis dots because you've taken
out some of the material from the secondary source. Note that period
goes behind parenthesis.
3) comment on the quote
It is the "bittersweet" that
lends the story its depth, transforming a story about walking out on a
job to a story about learning the difficult lesson that standing up for
your beliefs is seldom rewarded.
4) compose a correct formatted MLA work cited entry
Luscher, Robert M. "A Study
of the Short Fiction." "A&P". Ed.
Wendy Perkins.
Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace
College Publishers, 1998. 30-33. Print.
Here we have a paragraph that drifts away a bit from the
topic at hand (Sammy's flawed character), and thus needs work with
clarity -- and with correctly citing the source.
Paragraph 2
Sammy is an everyday hero
because his character is flawed. Traditionally, a hero is a supreme
being who always achieves in defeating adversaries and providing a
happy ending. In reality, heroes of such epic proportions do not exist.
Sammy is a realistic hero because while his intentions are righteous
and he acts gallantly, he still fails in getting the girl. A
traditional hero would have whisked the girl away, defeated the
defeated the bad guy, Lengel, and become the new and most celebrated
manager of the A&P. The flaws in Sammy's character are seen
clearly when in sticking up for the girls Sammy falters and instead of
saying something great he mumbles, “I started to say something that
came out ‘fiddle-de-do'.” (18). When Sammy finally makes it outside the
girls are gone. Now it is evident that Sammy is a realistic hero
because the guy does not always get the girl, and can become
tongue-tied just like everyone else.
Revision of Paragraph 2 #4 -- with
Secondary Source
Sammy is an everyday hero
because his character is flawed. Traditionally, a hero is a supreme
being, always succeed in defeating adversaries leaving readers with a
happy ending. In reality, heroes of such epic proportions do not exist.
Instead, Sammy is a more realistic hero because while his intentions,
on the surface, are righteous -- he Lengel "You didn't have to
embarrass them" (18) -- his behavior -- calling a customer a "witch"
(14), focusing on the girls' body parts -- reveals not a hero but a
stereotypical young adult male who has no patience for others and who
views women as sex objects. His flaws are also seen when he
tries to respond to Lengel's "It was they who were embarrassing us"
(18). Instead of a clever come back, he falters, and mumbles "something
that came out ‘fiddle-de-do'” (18). This response humanizes him: we've
all had that moment when we need a great come back, but become
tongue-tied. These flaws invest his actions with a realism that fits
the situation: a young man whose conscience has awakened and
who, as the critic Gilbert Porter suggests, "has chosen to live
honestly and meaningfully" (66). In the tradition of the
classic unsung America hero who rides out of town, Sammy makes his
stand at an American institution -- A&P -- and, according to
Ronald E. McFarland, "achieves a certain degree of heroism" (61).
Revision
of Paragraph 2 #7 -- with Secondary Source (and more closely proofread)
Sammy is an everyday hero
because his character is flawed. Traditionally, a hero is a supreme
being who gallantly defeats adversaries. In reality, heroes of such
epic proportions do not exist. Instead, Sammy is a more realistic hero
because while his intentions seem righteous -- he tells Lengel "You
didn't have to embarrass them" (18) -- his behavior -- calling a
customer a "witch" (14), focusing on the girls' body parts -- is
contemptible. His flaws are also seen when he tries to
respond to Lengel's comment about the conduct of the girls: "It was
they who were embarrassing us" (18). Instead of a clever retort, Sammy
falters and mumbles "something that came out ‘fiddle-de-do'” (18). This
response humanizes him; we've all had that moment when we need a great
come back, but became tongue-tied. These flaws invest his actions with
a realism that fits the situation. Sammy's actions reveal a
young man whose conscience has awakened and who, as the critic
Gilbert Porter suggests, "has chosen to live honestly and meaningfully"
(66). Significantly, Sammy makes this decision, and according to Ronald
E. McFarland, "achieves a certain degree of heroism" (61), at an
A&P, an American institution which symbolizes the kind of
mindless obedience that Sammy is fighting.
Works
Cited
McFarland, Ronald. "Updike
and the Critics: Reflections on
'A&P'." "A&P."
Ed. Wendy Perkins. Fort Worth, Texas:
Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1998. 56-62. Print.
Porter, M. Gilbert.
"John Updike's 'A&P'; The Establishment and
an Emersonian
Cashier." "A&P." Ed. Wendy
Perkins.
Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace College Publishers,
1998. 62-66. Print.
Updike,
John. "A&P." Literature: An
Introduction to Fiction,
Poetry and
Drama. Ed. X. J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. New
York: Longman, 2002. 14-19. Print.
Note how the revision both refocused the paragraph on
Sammy's flaws, and then added an outside source to support the idea in
the paragraph.
© 2010 David Bordelon
|